Here's an interesting article, for you parents who feel that teaching abstinance is stupid. What will you teach your boys on this one? If you read the article, you can see the comments that the public in general have made on it.
Virus that causes cervical cancer gaining as cause of oral cancer in men
Associated Press
Feb. 1, 2008 02:54 PM
ATLANTA - The sexually transmitted virus that causes cervical cancer in women is poised to become one of the leading causes of oral cancer in men, according to a new study.
The virus called HPV now causes as many cancers of the upper throat as tobacco and alcohol, probably due both to an increase in oral sex and the decline in smoking, researchers say.
The only available vaccine against HPV, made by Merck & Co. Inc., is currently given only to girls and young women. But Merck plans this year to ask government permission to offer the shot to boys.
Experts say a primary reason for male vaccinations would be to prevent men from spreading the virus and help reduce the nearly 12,000 cases of cervical cancer diagnosed in U.S. women each year. But the new study should add to the argument that there may be a direct benefit for men, too.
"We need to start having a discussion about those cancers other than cervical cancer that may be affected in a positive way by the vaccine," said study co-author Dr. Maura Gillison of Johns Hopkins University.
The study was published Friday in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.
Human papillomavirus, or HPV, is the leading cause of cervical cancer in women. It also can cause genital warts, penile and anal cancer - risks for males that generally don't get the same attention as cervical cancer.
Previous research by Gillison and others established HPV as a primary cause of the estimated 5,600 cancers that occur each year in the tonsils, lower tongue and upper throat. It's also been known that the virus' role in such cancers has been rising.
The new study looked at more than 30 years of National Cancer Institute data on oral cancers. Researchers categorized about 46,000 cases, using a formula to divide them into those caused by HPV and those not connected to the virus.
They concluded the incidence rates for HPV-related oral cancers rose steadily in men from 1973 to 2004, becoming about as common as those from tobacco and alcohol.
The good news is that survival rates for the cancer are also increasing. That's because tumors caused by HPV respond better to chemotherapy and radiation, Gillison said.
"If current trends continue, within the next 10 years there may be more oral cancers in the United States caused by HPV than tobacco or alcohol," Gillison said.
Studies suggest oral sex is associated with HPV-related oral cancers, but a cause-effect relationship has not been proved. Other researchers have suggested that even unwashed hands can spread it to the mouth as well.
Gillison pointed toward sex as an explanation for the increase in male upper throat cancers. However, HPV-related upper throat cancers declined significantly in women from 1973 to 2004.
Merck's vaccine, approved for girls in 2006, is a three-dose series priced at about $360. It is designed to protect against four types of HPV, including one associated with oral cancer.
Merck has been testing the vaccine in an international study, but it is focused on anal and penile cancer and genital warts, not oral cancers, said Kelley Dougherty, a Merck spokeswoman.
"We are continuing to consider additional areas of study that focus on both female and male HPV diseases and cancers," Dougherty said. Merck officials did not comment of Gillison's study.
Government officials and the American Cancer Society say they don't know yet whether the vaccine will be successful at preventing disease in men. No data from Merck's study are available yet.
Indeed, it's not clear yet that the vaccine even prevents the HPV infection in males, let alone cancer or any other illness, said Debbie Saslow of the American Cancer Society.
Merck plans to seek U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval for the vaccine in men later this year, meaning a government decision would be likely in 2009.
" just my Opinion"















I don't think teaching
I don't think teaching abstinence is stupid. But I don't think we can teach only abstinence. We have to teach responsibility too. Believe me, I don't want my son coming home in a few years and telling me his girlfriend is pregnant. I'd rather he didn't have sex until he's at least in college. I pray that will be the reality, but if it's not, I hope that I teach him to be responsible and use protection...not just because of pregnancy, but I also don't want him catching any STDs.
STD's are still there in
STD's are still there in college. Why not teach not to have sex.. if you read this you will see that the virus is on the mouth/tongue, some think by ignoring it because it's gross, but it's fact. sticking your tongue one place and then in the mouth of another it spreads disease no matter how gross it may sound.. If kids are taught to wait until marriage, and they do the chances of the STD isn't there.. Yes there is other way to or other forms of HPV, but to think that these kids are passing on from boyfriend/girlfriend is pretty gross.. But then again some ppl think just use protection or pop a pill that take care of it, instead of teaching.
" just my Opinion"
I've never heard anyone on
I've never heard anyone on this blog or anywhere say "teaching abstinance is stupid", like MusicMom has stated, the issue is teaching abstinance isn't the whole story and is inadequate, never has it been "stupid."
As far as this topic, let's vaccinate our boys too if they discover this vaccine will prevent disease in men too.
Lovemy4 is a discussion leader for North Central Phoenix, tired mother of 4 great kids and wife to one great husband.
I noticed you post this
I noticed you post this story twice.So are you really wanting to inform us mom's or are you trying to have a debate on our moral ground? Given your first sentence I would say you aren't trying to inform.....so what is your point?
As lovemy4 said from what I have read I never heard a mom say abstinance was stupid.
To me your information is only another slap in the face of what happens because our children aren't educated. I was listening to NPR a while back and they were talking about how most girls in middle to junior high thought as long as they weren't having intercourse then anything else wasn't sex...ORAL SEX of course is sex....and if not educated, we will here more and more of these stories.
yes I did post it twice. I
yes I did post it twice. I found it quite interesting that no one touched on the first one and probably because no one really wanted to think about it.. It isnt going to go away and I can see this disease becoming full blown and parents like yourself will probably just pray for a condom for the tongue.. Deal with reality, and in previous post, alot of you moms attacked us very very few moms who believed that we should teach kids to wait until marriage. Not that anything you can say will change what I believe to be moral and right. BUT I did exactly what I wanted and that was to get you all to think about it.. so if it does happen to any of your kids, you can't say you didn't know.. You KNOW now.. And im not surprise of the defensive response from you all.. MADE YOU THINK!
think twice about were your kids mouth has been or even your spouses.
" just my Opinion"
I don't think teaching
I don't think teaching abstinence is stupid either and I will. However the stats are 95% of people have sex before marriage, I dont know anyone that didnt, that is the reality. The only thing we can do is to educate our kids and hope for the best. Kids will do what kids will do, I know I did. Open communication is the key.
sara
sara
I know alot of ppl that
I know alot of ppl that waited until marriage, I have a friend getting married in a month, she's 36 been married before, has two kids, the guy she is marrying has never been married same age no kids, and they have been dating for 2 years and haven't put themselves in a position of temptation. THey have traveled to San Diego and else where and have made moral choices to not sleep in the same hotel room ect. She looks forward to her new life with him and her honeymoon, when they can actually make love to each other, and he feels the same.. He is a man of integrity and self respect and she is also, and she is also setting a great example to her children.. And also her ex, has told the kids that this is the way it should be done and that he messed up, with affairs and stuff.. I waited until marriage and so did my sister..
But then we were raised with very strong morals, values and principles, never did my parents say that the odds are against us, or that most ppl have sex before marriage, they set the ground rules to us kids and that was that.. We had open communication with my parents (rules and a relationship with them) and we were also taught the ways of the Bible and that was that.. So I use they example my parents gave me along with my faith and trust in Christ to raise my kids.
" just my Opinion"