I saw this and wanted to share it. The last paragraph says it all I think. This is kind of long, but not to bad. I am a middle child and although I do see some of myself in the description, I do not follow the rest :)
So, how about you? Where do you fall in the birth order and do these descriptions work for you??
Jobs & Birth Order
Oldest, Middle, Youngest: Who's More Successful?
By KATE LORENZ, CAREERBUILDER.COM EDITOR
Blame it on social class, education -- even luck, but according to Dalton Conley, New York University professor of sociology and public policy, inequality begins at home. In his book 'The Pecking Order: Which Siblings Succeed and Why,' Conley says that 75 percent of the income inequality between individuals in the United States occurs between siblings in the same families. He points to the diverse fortunes of Bill and Roger Clinton, and Jimmy and Billy Carter as examples.
Research shows that first-borns (and onlys) lead the pack in terms of educational attainment, occupational prestige, income and net worth. Conversely middle children in large families tend to fare the worst. (Marcia! Marcia! Marcia!)
"A child's position in the family impacts his personality, his behavior, his learning and ultimately his earning power," states Michael Grose, author of 'Why First-Born Rule the World and Last-borns Want to Change It.' "Most people have an intuitive knowledge that birth order somehow has an impact on development, but they underestimate how far-reaching and just how significant that impact really is."
Conley concedes that birth order is significant in shaping individual success, but only for children of large families -- four or more siblings -- and in families where finances and parental time are constrained. (In wealthy families, like the Bushes and Kennedys, it has less effect.)
Here's a look at what impact your birth order may have on you:
First-Borns:
More conscientious, ambitious and aggressive than their younger siblings, first-borns are over-represented at Harvard and Yale as well as disciplines requiring higher education such as medicine, engineering or law. Every astronaut to go into space has been either the oldest child in his or her family or the eldest boy. And throughout history -- even when large families were the norm -- more than half of all Nobel Prize winners and U.S. presidents have been first-born.
Famous eldest children include: Hillary Clinton, Bill Clinton, Richard Branson, J.K. Rowling and Winston Churchill. And macho movie stars are First-Born, too, including Clint Eastwood, John Wayne, Sylvester Stallone, Bruce Willis and all the actors who have played James Bond.
Middles:
Middle children are more easy going and peer-oriented. Since they can get lost in the shuffle of their own families, they learn to build bridges to other sources of support and therefore tend to have excellent people skills. Middle children often take on the role of mediator and peacemaker.
Famous middle children include: Bill Gates, J.F.K., Madonna and Princess Diana.
Youngest:
The youngest child tends to be the most creative and can be very charming -- even manipulative. Because they often identify with the underdog, they tend to champion egalitarian causes. (Youngest siblings were the earliest backers of the Protestant Reformation and the Enlightenment.)
Successful in journalism, advertising, sales and the arts, famous youngest children include Cameron Diaz, Jim Carrey, Drew Carey, Rosie O'Donnell, Eddie Murphy and Billy Crystal.
Only Children:
Only children have similar characteristics to first-borns and are frequently burdened with high parental expectations. Research shows they are more confident, articulate and likely to use their imagination than other children. They also expect a lot from others, hate criticism, can be inflexible and are likely to be perfectionists. Well-known only children include Rudy Guiliani, Franklin Delano Roosevelt, Alan Greenspan, Tiger Woods, tennis' teen queen Maria Sharapova and Leonardo Da Vinci.
Twins:
Because they hold equal status and are treated so similarly, twins turn out similarly in most cases. Consider advice columnists "Dear Abby" and "Ann Landers" (Abigail and Esther Friedman), and Harold and Bernard Shapiro, who became presidents of Princeton University and Canada's McGill University respectively.
Dr. Frank Sulloway, a behavioral scientist and visiting professor at the Institute of Personality and Social Research at University of California, Berkeley and author of the book, 'Born To Rebel: Birth Order, Family Dynamics and Creative Lives,' says first-borns are more similar in personality to first-borns in other families than they are to their own younger siblings. He adds that youngest children are often more similar to the youngest child in another family than his or her own elder siblings. He says this is because the family is not as much a "shared environment" as a set of niches that provide siblings with different outlooks.
Conley agrees, but stresses that these are just general trends -- and that the whole birth-order theory can be turned on its head depending on the child's personality, the age gap between siblings and the family circumstances each child experiences during his or her formative years.
KarilouMomof2 is a discussion leader for arizonamoms.com living in Tempe. Her daughters are 9 and 6.


















I remember something similar
I remember something similar in "Time" magazine. I meant to read it, but I think I accidently recycled it in an ambitious house cleaning before guests arrived.
I'm a first-born, and I do think of myself as ambitious. But frankly all my siblings were. It was the way we were raised.
Arizona Moms Editor Yvette Armendariz shares stories about raising her kids and tips for busy parents in her Time-starved (goddess) Mom blog. She and her husband are raising two children, ages 8 and 11.
Interesting. I have to
Interesting. I have to agree with the last paragraph though. I say this because i am the middle child and by far more ambitious than my 2 siblings and much more responsible.
In other articles i've read, "two first borns" were mentioned . Meaning if you have two children with 5+ years separating them, it's like having two first borns. I'm not so sure about that seeing my friend and his brother grow up. We are still in contact and the younger of the two does come across as very charming and very manipulative....but he is also one of the most selfish people i have ever met.
I wonder how step siblings fit in to all of this?
just~me
I'm the youngest of 4, but
I'm the youngest of 4, but am 11 years younger than my next sibling (can you say, "oops"?) I have always identified more with characteristics of a combination of youngest and only. This is the first time I've heard of the "two first borns" idea. Interesting.
GopherGirl
I am also the youngest of
I am also the youngest of four. There are 6 years between me and my nearest sibling. These descriptions seem sort of like zodiac signs to me...you can find a bit of yourself in all of them if you really try. I never found that birth order had any particular affect on how we all turned out, it was really the environment in which we were raised that contributed more to how we turned out.
Susan & Neil Hampton have three spectacular children, Alexander, Isabel and David, plus one amazing teenager, Eric. Susan does community outreach for arizonamoms.com.
“In the spring, at the end of the day, you should smell like dirt.” - Margaret Atwood
I read something like this
I read something like this before....interesting..
I am the only child. And as Susan said you can find yourself in these descriptions......I always take the good things...Oh, yes, thats me.....Oh, the perfection...... Ha..ha! NOT!
Wow! Although I don't agree
Wow! Although I don't agree with all of this, many of the personality characteristics ring true with my own three kids. I believe I treat them all equally, but this made me aware of how important it is to treat your kids the same - no matter the birth order.
Lattemom is the mother of three energetic kids ages 6, 8 & 11 and a discussion leader for arizonamoms.com.